|
Freedom vs.
Security: A False Choice
In recent days
administration officials have warned the nation about possible terrorist
attacks, subjecting us once again to color-coded threat charts and puzzling
admonitions to go about our lives as usual. The message is
clear: grave danger surrounds us, but ordinary citizens should do nothing and
trust the government take care of it.
But the obvious lesson of
September 11th is that government cannot protect us. Even
with trillions of tax dollars spent on “defense,” hijacked planes flew
unchallenged over our skies and attacked national symbols of business and
government. Yet now we’re told to put even more faith into
the same bureaucracies that failed us so miserably in the past? Self-reliance
and self-defense are American virtues; trembling reliance on the illusion of
government-provided security is not.
It's easy for elected
officials in Washington to tell Americans that government will do whatever it
takes to defeat terrorism, but it’s your freedom and your tax dollars at stake-
not theirs. The history of the 20th century demonstrates that
the Constitution is violated most egregiously during times of
crisis. Many of our worst unconstitutional agencies and
programs began during the two world wars and the Depression, when the public was
anxious and willing to view government as a savior and protector.
Ironically, the Constitution itself was conceived in a time of great
crisis. The founders intended to place inviolable restrictions on what the
federal government could do even in times of great distress.
America must guard against current calls for government to violate the
Constitution- meaning break the law- in the name of law enforcement.
The misnamed Patriot Act,
presented to the public as an anti-terrorism measure, actually focuses on
American citizens rather than foreign terrorists. For example, the definition of
"terrorism" for federal criminal purposes has been greatly expanded; future
administrations may consider you a terrorist if you belong to a pro-gun group, a
citizen militia, or a pro-life organization. Legitimate protest against the
government could place you (and tens of thousands of other Americans) under
federal surveillance. Similarly, your internet use can be monitored without your
knowledge, and your internet provider can be forced to hand over user
information to law enforcement without a warrant or subpoena.
The biggest problem with
these new law enforcement powers is that they bear little relationship to
fighting terrorism. Surveillance powers are greatly expanded, while checks and
balances on government are greatly reduced. Most of the provisions have been
sought after by domestic law enforcement agencies for years, not to fight
terrorism, but rather to increase their police power over the American
people. The federal government has made no showing that it
failed to detect or prevent the September 11th attacks because of the civil
liberties that will be compromised by this new legislation.
America was founded by
men who understood that the threat of domestic tyranny is as great as any threat
from abroad. If we want to be worthy of their legacy, we must
resist the rush toward ever-increasing state control of our society.
Otherwise, our own government will become a greater threat to our
freedoms than any foreign
terrorist.
|