|
The Case Against Adultery
by Burt Prelutsky
Not being religious, I don't feel comfortable discussing other people's sins. Even
where the Ten Commandments are concerned, I'm probably only batting about .650.
However, one of the thou-shalt-nots I seem to take more seriously than a lot of other
people, including those in the church-going crowd, is number seven on the hit parade, the
one dealing with adultery.
Having been divorced twice, I recognize that all marriages are not made in
heaven. Some, in fact, seem to have been cobbled together in Dr. Frankenstein's
basement. Speaking from experience, there are perfectly good reasons for certain unions
to be dissolved. But, for the life of me, I cannot come up with a single decent excuse for
adultery. Frankly, I regard adulterers as lying, contemptible, sleazebags. I can't begin to
imagine how they live with themselves, let alone their mates. Even the terminology is
distasteful, unless, unlike most of us, you don't mind being a cheater.
I recall hearing that Chicago's mayor, the late Richard Daley, who was one of the
last of the big city bosses, when once asked why, with all the women available to him, he
remained faithful to his wife, replied, "If I can't keep my word to my wife, why should
anybody else trust me?"
Now the story may be apocryphal, and, for all I know, Mayor Daley may have
been a worse hound than Bill Clinton, but the point is still a good one. If before man and
God, you pledge your troth, and, first chance you get, you hop into the sack with
someone you're not married to, you're nothing but a four-flusher.
What truly confounds me are cheating couples who eventually wind up married to
each other, and are then astonished that their partner is now cheating with somebody new.
Anybody who believes they are so special, so beautiful, so fascinating, so charismatic,
that they can trust their adulterous spouse to remain faithful is not only terminally
narcissistic, but more gullible than the hayseed who pays good money for the deed to
Brooklyn Bridge.
After giving it some thought, I am convinced that there are motives for adultery
that have little or nothing to do with sex. I believe the first of these is based on
resentment. Either the husband or the wife feels neglected because kids, work, hobbies
or booze, seem to have supplanted them in importance. The adultery not only provides
them with a temporary ego-boost, but it gives them the feeling that they're extracting a
measure of well-deserved revenge. That is why after the initial excitement of the illicit
affair wears off, the adulterer begins to resent the fact that his or her mate doesn't even
suspect anything. Their attitude often changes from one of "Oh, aren't I the clever one to
be pulling the wool over the fool's eyes!" to "The damn fool doesn't notice because
he/she doesn't think I'm sexy enough to attract anybody." Ultimately, it's vanity, rather
than a guilty conscience, that leads them to confess all.
Another reason that people risk destroying their marriages, hurting their children
and damaging their reputations, is because their lives are so darn boring, and I'm not
even referring to their sex lives. The truth is that most people live lives, not necessarily
of quiet desperation, but filled with tedious activities spent with boring, mind-numbing,
dullards. What makes it even worse is that every time they turn on the TV or pick up a
magazine, they're confronted by gorgeous celebrities, male and female, living the way
they'd like to -- a mad whirl of parties and premieres, vacations in exotic locales, private
jets, limousines, servants, and, yes, tacky affairs. Well, chum, with your income, your
humdrum job and your ordinary looks, you can forget about everything on the list except
that last item. But even you can meet George or Helen the second and fourth Tuesdays of
every month at the Bide-a-While Motel.
And aren't you, for about an hour or so, every bit as sexy and glamorous as Brad
Pitt and Angelina Jolie? Sure, if you say so.
But when you drive home afterwards, saddled down with a load of guilt and self-
contempt, can you honestly say the lay was worth the lie?
—(10/14/05)
[Discuss This Article.]
Mr. Prelutsky lives and writes in the San Fernando Valley.
He has been a humor columnist for the L.A. Times, a movie critic for Los Angeles magazine and has written for the New York Times, TV Guide, Modern Maturity, Emmy, Holiday, American Film, and Sports Illustrated.
For television, he has written for Dragnet, McMillan & Wife, MASH, Mary Tyler Moore, Rhoda, Bob Newhart, Family Ties, Dr. Quinn and Diagnosis Murder.
You can learn more about Burt and his latest book, Conservatives Are from Mars (Liberals Are from San Francisco) at his home page. Write Mr. Prelutsky at:
|